Monday, March 11, 2019NM Pot Watch: House Approves Legal Weed; What's the Rush? Feds May Do It Soon Enough, Plus: This Session's Feel Good Bill
Welcome back. Let's catch up.
It was a historic vote when the state House approved legalization of recreational marijuana Thursday night on a narrow 36-34 vote and sent it to the Senate. But there's still plenty of skepticism that state government is equipped to get into the marijuana distribution business, as the bill mandates. They cite state agencies like the Children Youth and Families Department (CYFD) and MVD that struggle to get their jobs right and wonder how state-run marijuana shops would fare in a state where bureaucracy so often goes awry. Why not wait? The federal legalization of marijuana appears, if not around the corner, at least happening in the foreseeable future: A growing list of Democratic presidential contenders want the U.S. government to legalize marijuana, reflecting a nationwide shift as more Americans look favorably on cannabis. Making marijuana legal at the federal level is the “smart thing to do,” says California Sen. Kamala Harris, a former prosecutor whose home state is the nation’s largest legal pot shop. New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker, a prominent legalization advocate on Capitol Hill, says the war on drugs has been a “war on people.” The go slow pot crowd says having a federal regulatory umbrella for pot distribution--one with decades of experience dealing with alcohol and drugs--makes much more sense than leaving it to a state that has been hapless in trying to deal with an epidemic of drug abuse that, among other things, has precipitated a years-long ABQ crime wave. Several anti-legalization lawmakers say one of the more misleading (and perhaps nonsensical) arguments heard in favor of legalization during the House debate was that it would somehow break up the international drug cartels. But the cartels have already beefed up their distribution of much more dangerous drugs like meth, heroin and fentanyl as more states legalize weed. Do we want to legalize those as well? We were quizzical when NM GOP Chairman Steve Pearce decided to pen an anti-legalization op-ed recently, but with three GOP state Senators lobbying R's on the Senate Finance Committee to get the bill through in the final days, maybe Pearce chose the right topic after all. Simple decriminalization of marijuana, as proposed by State Senator Joe Cervantes, would address a chief concern that legalization advocates say they have--putting a halt to the arrest and jailing of low income people of color for possession of small amounts of cannabis. But Joe's plan is ridiculed as old-fashioned, even as the national marijuana advocates dismiss the unique drug culture in NM that has been embedded for generations and has caused untold human suffering and loss of life. It is indeed different here than in the more wealthy states that are taking the dive into legalized marijuana. Much different. The population here is much more vulnerable. Maybe the Senate Finance Committee will get that.
A final note on this from Albuquerque Dem liberal state Senator Jerry Ortiz y Pino who has long supported legalization but says this bill will not achieve the goal of preventing the arrest of people for possessing small amounts of pot:
This bill creates a state-run store - which is fine, but not so fine is that you can still be arrested for growing or possession without a receipt on hand. In other words, barring a related decriminalization bill getting signed into law, New Mexico will continue to fill prisons with people arrested for a non-violent crime.
I know this bill is a compromise, but I was hoping the whole point was to keep people from going to jail, especially people of color who are incarcerated at higher rates than Anglos, for an illegal act that should never have been made an illegal act.
Like we’ve said, Jerry. Do the Cervantes decriminalization bill this session, see how that works and then take it from there.
THE FEEL GOOD BILL This is a well-intentioned measure. Several lawmakers and their supporters worked hard, but in the end it backfired because it takes the heat off. We explain. . .Opponents of what they call "raiding" the nearly $18 billion Land Grant Permanent School Fund for very early childhood programs have a new skirt to hide behind. It's called the Early Childhood Education and Care Department approved by the Legislature and headed to the Governor's desk. It was a very easy vote to take since its main task is to place under one roof administration of early childhood education programs that are scattered among various agencies. Tellingly, it does not increase funding for those programs, just leaves the impression that there is some kind of unspecified mismanagement going on with the programs and that this bureaucratic shift will solve the imagined problems. As we said, what an easy vote to take. It was approved 39-2 in the Senate, revealing the toothlessness of the feel good gesture. Such overwhelming "bipartisanship" is often Santa Fe's code word for a "nothing burger" and that description aptly fits this bill. The issue is not fraud and/or bungling in early childhood programs (as some supporters of the new department outlandishly imply) it is access to them. As education expert and blog reader Stephen Spitz pointed out here last week: The state's early childhood education programs remain minuscule. For example, the Home Visiting program, for children prenatal to 3, presently serves 3,500 kids out of total client population of 70,000. Numerous studies have found that home visiting gets the biggest bang for the buck, particularly for "at risk" children, such as the 82% of NM births which are Medicaid qualified. In short, ECE needs to be dramatically expanded if we hope to address the state's economic, education, and social crises. Hmm. Nothing about that in all the hype over the early childhood department. What you get instead is a new and unnecessary cabinet secretary (#23!) along with some kind of ambiguous "streamlining" and "consolidation" of early childhood efforts. It is an inexpensive deception that is useful for relieving the guilty conscience of lawmakers over their reticence to directly attack the ongoing societal wreckage in the state.
What you get is a Secretary Feel Good, but what you don't get is the requisite cash to bring ECE to the tens of thousands of children who need it. That opportunity is being lost as the Senate again moves to kill the constitutional amendment to use a small portion of the Permanent Fund to finally fund programs that are true game changers. Instead we get the Nothing Burger.
Thanks, Santa Fe, but we'll take a pass. If you change your mind, meet us at Blake's and we'll be glad to talk about the real deal. THE BOTTOM LINES While the state dawdles, the Millenials depart. Now it's even easier for them to get out of here: Options to and from the Albuquerque International Sunport are again on the rise, most recently with Southwest Airlines’ announcement of expanded service from Austin, Texas. The airline, which currently offers weekend-only options from Austin, is expanding to daily offerings beginning August 6. This is the home of New Mexico politics. E-mail your news and comments. (jmonahan@ix.netcom.com) Interested in reaching New Mexico's most informed audience? Advertise here. ![]() (c)NM POLITICS WITH JOE MONAHAN 2019 |
![]() ![]() |







