Tuesday, October 20, 2026Post-Election Pipeline Reversal Could Fast-Track NM’s $165B Project Jupiter, Plus: "Joined the Wrong Party": Readers React to GOP Candidate Didi Okpareke, And: St. Cyr: Don't Pay NM Lawmakers Without Strict Accountability
New Mexico's political class continues to break with vehement grassroots opposition to Project Jupiter, and that could mean a major break for the controversial data center development near Santa Teresa following the Nov. 3 election. In a recent KKOB radio debate (audio here) Democratic land commissioner candidate Juan Sanchez signaled the possible reversal of a decision made by current Land Commissioner and Dem lieutenant governor nominee Stephanie Garcia Richard. She denied Jupiter the right of way across state trust land to construct a natural gas pipeline that would fuel the center being built by tech giant Oracle. Here's Sanchez: "I understand where the commissioner is coming from," Sanchez said. But he added that the alternative to the 0.6-mile route is longer and would run through adjacent federal land. This is a big deal for the biggest construction project in New Mexic0 history (up to $165 billion). A go-ahead for the pipeline would be a major push forward for Jupiter, which continues to deal with challenges—including a battle for a state air permit vital to continued construction. Sanchez is making no friends on the Democratic left with this statement, but he is ahead in the polls and has taken oil and gas campaign contributions. His GOP opponent, Roswell County Commissioner Michael Perry, goes even further than Sanchez regarding Garcia Richard's rejection of the pipeline: "I think it’s a poor decision, and the reason I think it’s a poor decision doesn’t have anything to do with the data center," Perry said, adding that the State Land Office has a fiduciary responsibility to New Mexicans.
Protesters have sophisticated backing from the environmental group New Energy Economy, whose stiff opposition to Jupiter has rallied enviros. But the political tea leaves—and the impracticality of shutting down a project already 26 percent completed and employing thousands—make stopping it unlikely. The PR on the project has been a case study on how not to win and has cost the data center developers time, money and goodwill. But the boiling rage over the project finally seems to be cooling with the fall temperatures, and perhaps the realization that the data center is too late to halt. Jupiter is finally starting to get the PR right, opening the center for a media tour and announcing that there are now 4,400 full-time construction workers at the site, with 600 of those workers coming from Doña Ana County and a total New Mexico workforce of 1,200. They say eventually the construction employment will hit 7,000. No wonder the state's major labor unions have rallied behind the project, and why Democratic politicians like Juan Sanchez and Haaland have room to compromise. The livelihoods of too many families are on the line to take a rigid ideological position. PRITZKER FOR VASQUEZ
. . . In a somewhat unusual move, Pritzker’s Ready for the Fight PAC recently took over $2.8 million in ad reservations supporting New Mexico Rep. Gabe Vasquez in his competitive reelection race, freeing up money for the House Majority PAC as it tries to play more offense. Like Michigan, New Mexico is a new addition to the early-state window, slated to hold its primary a week after New Hampshire in February 2028. National Dems have approved a February 15, 2028, presidential primary for New Mexico that must still be approved by the legislature. Pritzker has also been warm with MLG, who won't be governor when the prez primary is held but surely has her resume ready for any billionaire politicos who might be interested. DIDI A DEM?
I read your piece about Didi Okpareke with interest. She sounds like a real dynamo. But she seems to be missing the main point: If she is concerned about the war, food programs for families and investment in New Mexico she joined the wrong party. The Republicans started the war, they slashed funding for food programs and are grifting whatever money is left over. The good news is the Democratic Party is working to improve those issues. I realize she can't change her party right now, but after the election, she's welcome to join us. Hear that, Didi? Maybe Melanie can give you some fund-raising tips if you switch. Okpareke certainly got the attention of the Dem intelligentsia with her spunky performance against Stansbury. Here's reader Karl Kiser: I find it perplexing that Didi Okpareke is a Republican candidate for CD-1. Her parents migrated from Nigeria to the United States because of discrimination and violence against the Igbo people. I lived in Kaduna during a portion of these times. Igbo, in the north, had to flee or be killed simply by being a member of the wrong tribal group. Many were born in the Northern Region and never lived in the Eastern Region. The current Republican Party is on record promoting tribalism and a select form of nationalism. This is the antithesis of the opportunities Didi enjoys in the United States. I ask: Why is she a Republican Party candidate? Didi fan Amanda Castillo answered the critics with two words in her debate reaction: "Rock star!" NO ON FOUR
New Mexico voters should reject Constitutional Amendment 4—not because public service lacks value, but because the amendment gets the cart before the horse. Before approving salaries New Mexicans must demand fundamental accountability reforms. Amendment 4 would tie legislative salaries to the state’s median household income—nearly $68,000—while retaining per diem, mileage reimbursements, and generous pensions. However, turning legislative service into a paid public office requires clear, uncompromised standards. First, financial disclosure rules must be ironclad. The public deserves certainty that lawmakers face strict disclosure obligations so no elected official profits from legislation they help pass. Second, New Mexicans should know who is paid to influence legislation and which officials receive lobbying perks or donations—with activity made transparent during legislative sessions, not buried in opaque post-session reports. Furthermore, the state must close the revolving door by barring lawmakers from immediately returning to the Roundhouse as lobbyists to cash in on public service. Third, a salary demands measurable work in return. A modern Legislature should offer a simple, searchable dashboard tracking lawmakers' attendance, votes, committee participation, and district hours. Citizens shouldn't have to wade through scattered records just to verify if their representative showed up, engaged, or simply rubber-stamped party leadership. Every worker understands that a paycheck comes with performance expectations; public officials seeking a constitutional salary should be no exception. This is the Home of New Mexico politics. E-mail your news and comments. (newsguy@yahoo.com) Interested in reaching New Mexico's most informed audience? Advertise here. |
|








