The email stack is getting high, a sure sign that it's time for another highly anticipated edition of Reader Vox Populi We kick it off with this reaction from state House GOP Caucus Chair Rebecca Dow to our Wednesday blog on state healthcare and abortion:

 Joe, your report on abortion used soft terminology and glossed over what New Mexico’s health laws really allow. State law permits abortion through all stages of pregnancy, even procedures involving viable babies late in term, with no parental consent for minors. It protects and funds puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries that remove healthy body parts from youth, and promotes COVID shots for healthy babies at six months. These are not abstract policies—they are codified in law and funded with taxpayer dollars, and the public deserves honest language about them.

Another reader with a GOP lean writes:

One useful piece from the Guttmacher data stands out: In New Mexico, the number of clinics more than doubled—from six to thirteen, a 117% increase—while abortions rose by 256%, an increase of about 15,000. We’ve clearly shown the ability to mobilize resources when the issue draws national attention—serving thousands of women, mostly from Texas. Yet we can’t seem to muster the same will to keep our medical residents, expand primary care, or strengthen rural healthcare for New Mexicans. It’s a strange inversion of priorities. We can serve the nation’s headlines, but not our own people. 

MAYORAL DEBATE 

A reader identifying as Bobby Griego has armchair analysis of the ABQ mayoral campaign: 

Joe, I like your solution to the ban by KOAT of mayoral candidates Mayling Armijo and Eddie Varela from the Oct. 15 debate--if the are to be added the time allowance for the debate simply can be extended. Inclusion is generally a good idea, but so is substance. The city has some very critical issues facing it and residents deserve probing questions and detailed answers--not just fluff. Residents are all clear on what the main issues are; what they need are details on how each candidate is going to get that done. That will not happen with six candidates and limited time. 

Also, I find Mayor Keller's social media appeal for Armijo and Varela's inclusion to be disingenuous. It is clear that what he wants is a watered down debate. He does not want to get into issues and his record too deep. 

It is also obvious that what is happening is Mayling Armijo is auditioning for a position in a potential Keller third term--likely the ABQ Director of Economic Development. This would allow Terry Brunner to concentrate on being the Chief of Staff and not pull double duty. 

During the debate Armijo would act as Keller's shield, suck up time, and it will all be over before it actually begins. If Keller really wants to advance democracy and promote transparency during the election, he should agree to more debates.

RIO RANCHO FOR KELLER

Longtime reader Mitchell Freedman monitors all things political in the state, even races he can't vote in: 

Joe, I live in Rio Rancho. As a relative new resident of New Mexico in 2017, I was excited for and backed, Tim Keller in his first run as mayor. I believed, with his statewide leadership and experience, his experience in finance and friendly demeanor that he would hit the ground running. I admit to being deeply surprised and disappointed at how he functioned in the first term and part of the second term. However, I now believe Keller has finally gotten a handle on crime and homelessness and has shown more wisdom in how to lead a city with the level of challenges Albuquerque has.

As I look at who is running against him, I see nobody ready for prime time. Running this city is harder than running the state due to municipal governmental constraints. When I see the way in which these other candidates have behaved in this campaign, it feels as if there is more vanity than either experience or wisdom in their wanting to take on the mayoral role. If I lived in Albuquerque, I would be voting for Keller for his third term. Finally, I would add Keller's latest pronouncement--that the next term would be his last term--is also a sign of the wisdom he has learned in being the mayor of Albuquerque. 

POOR PORTAL 

Reader Vicky Salazar writes: 

Hi Joe, long time reader here. Just an average voter. But today I'm annoyed. I got so many texts and emails this weekend from candidates who asked me to sign their petitions--which I'm happy to do. But when I tried to sign into the Secretary of State portal to do so, I got an error message. Not once but all day! Isn't this a bit ironic that the portal is down and no one can get signatures while she gears up to announce her run for another office?! 

That's Vicky zinging SOS Maggie Toulouse Oliver who says she may run for lieutenant governor next year.  

HOMELESS IN ABQ

Reader John Strong writes:

 Hi Joe, I walk our neighborhood early each morning and noticed an SUV parked on the side of the street that was unfamiliar to me. After a few days my neighbor called and asked if we knew the car. They had seen the driver get out barefoot in the morning, stretch and then get back in and drive off, returning in the evening. He was causing no trouble, left no trash or disturbed anything, but it made me aware that I have seen at least three other vehicles like this jin our neighborhood near 15th and Central. It seemed obvious that this person had likely become homeless, but still had a car and likely a job, and may be just trying to hold on. 

I’m concerned about this being an emerging problem, where people who do not want to be homeless are desperately trying to stay afloat and clinging to some normalcy. Wouldn’t this be the best time for intervention? Before they lose the car or the job and become chronically homeless? I don’t blame the man for parking in my neighborhood, it's relatively safe and I'm sure that's why he was here. Should we have a safe monitored place for those in this situation? Wouldn’t that be better than forcing them into alleys and dark lots? And should we try and provide some way for them to have hygiene and clean clothes, if they’re trying to hold onto jobs? I m very concerned that in a developing economic downturn, this is a problem that could suddenly explode on us and we should be planning for solutions now. 

SHAMEFUL CAMPAIGN? 

A Santa Fe reader writes of the latest TV ad in the "state’s $2.9 million “Breaking Bad Habits” anti-litter campaign. It features "the notorious Salamanca characters, twin brothers and prolific hitmen in the popular hit TV series "Breaking Bad" and its spinoff "Better Call Saul," that were filmed here.

Joe, the new state litter campaign is shameful. Tying litter control to “territories” and glamorizing gang culture may be trendy, but it doesn’t reflect who we are as New Mexicans. I’m a fourth-generation New Mexican, not a tourist, politically middle of the road, and this isn’t about sides—it’s about pride. We can do better.   

Thanks to all for the thoughtful and insightful comments. We look forward to the next edition of Reader Vox Populi. 

This is the Home of New Mexico Politics.